Talk:Rapid prompting method

Skepticism C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Autism C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

RPM as its own page instead of redirect to FC

Rapid prompting method (RPM) was redirected to a page called Facilitated Communication (FC). While these two techniques are similar, RPM is slightly different and, I believe, warrants its own page. Though I could find some articles discussing RPM in popular literature, much of the discussion in favor of its use, at this point, appears to be anecdotal rather than evidence-based. That's not to say it isn't available. I just couldn't find it in my searches. I would like to see more peer-reviewed, evidence-based articles from reliable sources included on the page. SojoQ (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]