Talk:George Town, Penang/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Semi-auto (talk · contribs) 21:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm taking this one. I will try to sort out this review within one week. Thanks! Semi-auto (talk) 21:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

At first glance, the page seems to be well-written, with adequate citations and clear, concise prose. The use of collapsible tables is certainly commendable, as it helps keep the page short. Still, I feel there are too many images in this page which could be reduced to make the page more compact in terms of bytes, especially at the transportation section. There is also the image caption on the Penang State Museum which I think needs some sort of citation. But aside from these minor issues, the page (in my opinion) seems ready for GA. Semi-auto (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]