Relative effective Cartier divisor
An effective Cartier divisor in a scheme X over a ring R is a closed subscheme D of X that (1) is flat over R and (2) the ideal sheaf of D is locally free of rank one (i.e., invertible sheaf). Equivalently, a closed subscheme D of X is an effective Cartier divisor if there is an open affine cover of X and nonzerodivisors such that the intersection is given by the equation (called local equations) and its ideal sheaf is flat over R and such that they are compatible.
- If D and D' are effective Cartier divisors, then the sum is the effective Cartier divisor defined locally as if f, g give local equations for D and D' .
- If D is an effective Cartier divisor and is a ring homomorphism, then is an effective Cartier divisor in .
- If D is an effective Cartier divisor and a flat morphism over R, then is an effective Cartier divisor in X' with the ideal sheaf .
Taking of gives the exact sequence
- .
This allows one to see global sections of as global sections of . In particular, the constant 1 on X can be thought of as a section of and D is then the zero locus of this section. Conversely, if is a line bundle on X and s a global section of it that is a nonzerodivisor on and if is flat over R, then defines an effective Cartier divisor whose ideal sheaf is isomorphic to the inverse of L.
From now on suppose X is a smooth curve (still over R). Let D be an effective Cartier divisor in X and assume it is proper over R (which is immediate if X is proper.) Then is a locally free R-module of finite rank. This rank is called the degree of D and is denoted by . It is a locally constant function on . If D and D' are proper effective Cartier divisors, then is proper over R and . Let be a finite flat morphism. Then .[1] On the other hand, a base change does not change degree: .[2]
A closed subscheme D of X is finite, flat and of finite presentation if and only if it is an effective Cartier divisor that is proper over R.[3]
- ^ Katz–Mazur 1985, Lemma 1.2.8.
- ^ Katz–Mazur 1985, Lemma 1.2.9.
- ^ Katz–Mazur 1985, Lemma 1.2.3.