Jump to content

Talk:Technology stack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sn1per (talk | contribs) at 03:03, 27 December 2015 (re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing: Networking Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by Networking task force.

Proposed merge with Solution stack

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Don't merge, reconsidering and will repropose Sn1per (t)(c) 02:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Software stack (solution stack) is a type of technology stack. Since technology stacks can consist of a mix of software and hardware (and software stacks on their own aren't so much more important than other types of technology stacks that they should have a separate article) I propose that the solution stack be merged into technology stack. Cheers, Sn1per (t)(c) 02:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"Solution stack" is obviously not a valid term, as it's meaningless and not at all common. It seems to me that next, one needs to establish whether technology stack is even a valid term. Because is there such a thing as a hardware stack? It's widely known that "software stack" is a valid and inherently meaningful term, so should it be called that? The only way i could think of a reason to expand out to the more general phrase "technology stack" is if there's some requisite, nonspecific hardware concept like telecom, which complements software. But usually that refers to a service or a product, which isn't quite a stack; for example, a linux+webserver+wifi+AP hardware and software stack is aka "a router". But "technology stack" isn't wrong and I would want to see some common usage examples or explanation. — Smuckola(talk) 02:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think a good first step would be to get rid of this vague article by merging with solution stack, which at the moment covers software stacks in general, which is basically what this article covers. Then a discussion can be opened over whether or not to move it to software stack. Note Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive611#Move_reversal_request_for_Solution_stack_.2F_Software_stack Sn1per (t)(c) 03:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Solution stack

This article pretty much covers the same topic as solution stack. Sn1per (t)(c) 02:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]