Talk:Computational hardness assumption
![]() | Mathematics Start‑class Mid‑priority | |||||||||
|
![]() | Cryptography: Computer science Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
I am stunned to see that the article states that the RSA problem is more difficult than integer factorisation. This is not yet proven, and as such is merely speculations. 212.242.167.26 (talk) 17:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Good point. But I think the intention was to say that it is stronger assumption that RSA problem is hard than that integer factorization is hard, because it is not yet proven that the RSA problem is as hard as the integer factorization problem. I think that the article should be clarified somehow. I'm not quite sure how, yet. DRLB (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Same goes for the DLP and Diffie-Hellman. AFAIK there is no proof that DHP is easier than DLP, actually there's a link from the Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption page to a paper that suggests they may be equivalent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.170.10 (talk) 17:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_problem "the RSA problem is at least as easy as factoring, but it might well be easier" with sufficient explanations. so someone please change "RSA problem (stronger than factorization)" to "RSA problem (weaker than factorization)" - am i right? Hm nerd (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)