Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concurrent average memory access time
- Concurrent average memory access time (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:TOOSOON. The topic of this page was introduced in a 2014 research article in IEEE Computer, which so far has attracted, according to GScholar, 4 citations. Two of those are in the (non-peer reviewed) magazine HPC Today, and have been written by the author of the IEEE Computer article; they're the same article, but GScholar didn't get that. The third is a self-citation, leaving only one non-affiliated source. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
The C-AMAT wiki page has been viewed over 400 times from web users within three months. I do not believe that the number of publication citations is an accurate metric to use for determining the relevance of a topic. In fact, publications are for a technical audience, while wikipedia provides an overview from a high-level about a topic. Because of this, I believe there are many people who want to know about the general concept of C-AMAT as can be seen from the figure on the right as well as the numerous media appearances of C-AMAT. The current page statistics for the C-AMAT page are incorrect, and thus I understand why you may have gotten the wrong impression about the popularity of C-AMAT. 5 August 2015
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahaider3 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)