Talk:Digital inheritance
![]() | Death Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
4everb4
I deleted an external link to "https://www.4everb4.com/" since the website is using at least two of their three trust logos (TRUSTe and KPMG WebTrust) unauthorized. Checked: http://watchdog.truste.com/pvr.php?page=complaint and http://www.webtrust.org/overview-of-trust-services/index.aspx BenMoll (talk) 12:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)BenMoll (13:58, 10. Feb. 2010 (CEST))
Digital collections not physically owned
This article should mention what happens (or more likely discussions on what might happen) to e.g. iTunes collections, software licenses (in relation to the recent AutoCad ruling) where it might be the case that you license rather then own your collection. --129.215.149.97 (talk) 14:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Avantec (SecureSafe) taking influence on the article
I saw that the CloudSafe was deleted from the vendor list twice in a row, both edits were done from the same IP address. And both times SecureSafe was put into first place. I had a look at 194.191.40.100 and found it to be an Avantec IP. Avantec is a key investor into DSwiss. DSwiss runs Securesafe. They were knows as "DigitalInherit.com" before and changed their name recently to "SecureSafe". Now they remove links to CloudSafe. I guess people should carefully consider to use a service run by these people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.54.131.136 (talk) 18:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Digital estate
This article and Digital estate seem to be about the same topic. I'm wondering whether they should be merged. Any opinions on this? Tony Holkham (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Fully agree. The Digital estate article was only describing its sense in relation to Digital inheritance, and neither article was even close to being long enough to justify forking into two separate articles. I therefore merged Digital estate into Digital inheritance. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Notability
Can we remove the notability tag from this article? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Agree. The article needs a lot of work, but I think the subject is notable. Tony Holkham (Talk) 09:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)