Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Physics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History & Status

Untitled

So -- Are new CAMAC modules still being manufactured, or no? I guess this is still in use in some places, but is it used in the latest systems, e.g LHC? linas (talk) 00:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC) While I do not know of new projects that are implementing CAMAC systems, there are projects that are maintaining their CAMAC investment by buying new controllers for new computers, for example Ethernet controllers. We have recently (2014) sold new controllers to three customers. I do notice that CAMAC is omitted from the list of computer interfaces which is a shame as I believe it predates all but the serial RS232.[reply]