Talk:HTTP persistent connection
![]() | Computing Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Include a section on HTTP/1.0, keep-alive and proxy
There is no description of issues surrounding HTTP/1.0, keep-alive and proxy... Would be a good idea to introduce a section on this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.227.252 (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Can't get wikipedia to work
Keep getting "Proxy -- connection keep alive" inserted into text of article or discussion below where I was trying to edit.
When I make an edit, I get thrown to a page that says, basically that the edit failed.
Then I go back to the edit, click link at the top for "article" or "discussion," and my edit has been made after all.
And, I can never see the "Captcha" text.
I normally use FireFox on a Mac with OS X and NoScript (to protect against click-jacking, etc.) and the Little Snitch firewall and Apple firewall enabled,
Ports
How does this affect ports on the server and client? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.114.9.2 (talk) 19:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Why isn't there an entry about the HTTP protocol for this feature? Connection: Keep-Alive —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.152.104 (talk) 23:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Chrome
All the others are talked about here, so I thought I would ask: could someone add in details on how Chrome handles persistent connections please? 130.179.26.134 (talk) 23:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
bad diagram
I think the timeline diagram in the section 'Use in web browsers' doensn't show what connection persistency is all about: Reducing the number of TCP communication cycles. The 'open' and 'close' events should be shown with visible handshake communication. This would clarify the benefits expected with connection persistency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.182.86.242 (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Clarify?
What exactly needs to be clarified about sending and receiving multiple requests and responses over a single TCP connection? --70.185.166.136 (talk) 04:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)