Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of document interfaces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 20:47, 19 March 2013 (Signing comment by 99.184.72.30 - "Explanations needed: "). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Explanations needed

This article is quite useless unless some explanations are added about what each row and column header means. For example:

  • What is "multiple type document"?
    • How could SDI app have multiple document types, when it does not even allow multiple documents?
    • How come TDI does not have multiple document types if MDI has? How could adding a tab bar remove this capability?
  • What is small sized content? If an application can handle large size, how can it not handle small size?
  • "use simultaneously different application" what on earth does this mean? It is the OS that runs the applications.
  • "easy to view all document labels of same type document"???
  • "Controlled Single Document Interface"???
  • What is "MDI: Window splitting"? Does it mean that the application only allows non-overlapping windows?

--PauliKL (talk) 09:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More questions

Why would the document interface type influence the memory efficiency? Google Chrome is TDI but is horribly memory inefficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.72.30 (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]