Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATP (programming language)

ATP (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any reference to this online. I believe it fails inclusion guidelines. If anyone has a conflicting policy or a source to show me differently I think this should be deleted. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced, no evidence of notability. Fails WP:COI and WP:MADEUP. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article admits that this doesn't even exist yet (and, considering that this purports to be platform-independent object-oriented natural language programming, almost surely won't ever exist). Fails WP:MADEUP and/or WP:CRYSTAL, and would be a candidate for A7 speedy deletion except software is explicitly exempt from that criterion. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. No indication of why this subject should be notable. Appears to be completely WP:MADEUP. Msnicki (talk) 16:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was actually going to A7 this after waiting a few minutes. Never got around to this. WP:SNOW? ⁓ Hello 71 21:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per the article itself, the language does not exist, except perhaps as a development project, nor are there any users, nor are there any references. Rwessel (talk) 02:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Language at development stage; can't find references, searching on the net. Churn and change (talk) 03:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]