Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 March 31

< March 30	April 1 >

March 31

File:15th-baron-willoughby-of-parham-shield.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:15th-baron-willoughby-of-parham-shield.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

May not be uploader's own work. Would have expected edges to have been sharper. Cloudbound (talk) 00:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you not read!!!

read header on my talk page, forced out of retirement for an issue like this, that file has been online ages and its on my own sites and in m own publications. Removing an image I have created myself is a joke, let the copyright claimant contact me in person! In the meantime it will be displayed on my own sites in public domain, please advise the idiot who claims it breaches to challenge me in person.--pl (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the nom. The low quality looks like it is a photo taken of another item. Delete. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note Theses look like photographs taken of a painting at a monument (specifically Willoughby Monument) but since there is no freedom of panorama in the UK for painted works (see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Kingdom) this is not free. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The same probably applies to more images at Special:ListFiles/Rovington. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After looking over those files, I see many that would fall under the exact same criteria. I also see many that are just barely too young to be PD but are probably too old to be taken by said user. What can we do about these? Nom each one? -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so, or better bundle them all together. Note that the uploader has started a discussion here. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, the uploader has requested db-self on most all of his image, including this one. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Carly Rae JepsenInfobox.jpg

File:Carly Rae JepsenInfobox.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copyrighted picture that does not comply with fair use. Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 01:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Student Service Annual Trip.jpg

File:Student Service Annual Trip.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Shrubland.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:BITE2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:BITE Classroom.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:British Institute of Technology & E-commerce Library one.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:NANO LAB.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:BITE hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:British Institute of Technology & E-commerce (front view).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Shrubland Hall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Council in session.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:World Academic Council members.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:World Academic Council.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Leslie Hobson.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Annual.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:The Court.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:British Institute of Technology & E-commerce Graduation 2010.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Look at exif tag David Ingleby of Lighthouse Photography Ltd needs to provide permission for the image MorganKevinJ^(talk) 17:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just deleted the article British Institute of Technology & E-commerce after it was listed at WP:CP for seven days. These images are all of the same organisation so I suspect they're copyvios but I don't know enough about image searching to prove it. Given the uploaders name I suspect permission wouldn't be impossible but they haven't edited since December and the CP listing got no response. The place in File:The Court.JPG is also clearly the Palace of Westminster depsite what it claims to be and I suspect some of the other photos but they aren't immediately identifiable to me. NOTE TO CLOSING ADMIN: It is only the current version of File:British Institute of Technology & E-commerce Graduation 2010.JPG which I suspect. I have no reason to suspect the earlier version and from the image it doesn't even look like a BITE graduation (the file name was changed after the new version was uploaded.) Dpmuk (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It says that the earliest upload has "some copyright issues" so I assume that the earliest upload should be removed. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the Earliest upload may be removed, and i assume is already set for speedy deletion. The latest update has no issues so it can be kept as it is, i assume. Nadude (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embleem riog.jpg

File:Embleem riog.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

A photo of a 3D emblem isn't a logo consisting only of text and simple geometric shapes. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo 11LMB.jpg

File:Logo 11LMB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Way too much art for {{PD-textlogo}}. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mchsmain.jpg

File:Mchsmain.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like an artist's impression to me, rather than a photograph, meaning that the copyright is with the artist, which I suspect is not the uploader. Clarification on the origin of this image would be appreciated. CT Cooper · talk 15:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allvideo.jpg

File:Allvideo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Seems to be copyrighted by P. Lacey or FFLAG. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What?!!

Is this some sort of trolling you are doing, the file is released under Cc-by-sa-3.0|Historian Paul Lacey & FFLAG, the later means attribute, try an email. If you are trolling stop, look who owns the trade mark of the user ID and the ip associated with this posting. I really dislike trolls. --pl (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating a file for deletion under a possibly unfree tag is not trolling. Stefan2 is a diligent editor who generally cleans up files (very successfully, I might add). Found a website for this Paul Lacey here. I'm inclined to believe that that User:Rovington might be Mr. Lacey (see signature of "pl"). Being that the image is a collage of photos of the video "Parents Talking" which was made by the organization FFLAG. As such, I believe that FFLAG owns the rights to the image and since there is no evidence of permission, I say Delete. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original FFLAG web site--pl (talk) 14:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have given a link above to the the archived website, the first site. FFLAG have no issues with the archive site at all and the picture is published there. The original site was redesigned by professionals after it attracted the attention of sponsors. FFLAG contact details are 0845 652 0311, info@fflag.org.uk or write to FFLAG, PO Box 495, Little Stoke, Bristol, BS34 9AP. My contact person was Joyce Leyland who has since died, the other contact was Brenda Oaks at Manchester. The image was created by me whilst I was creating the site in 1999. I can confirm that FFLAG has no issues with the use of the image. I can be contacted via email care of wikipedia. --pl (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If FFLAG has no issues with the use of the image, a representative can send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with the appropriate image license tag they are releasing it under. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doctor Who - classic series DVDs.jpg

File:Doctor Who - classic series DVDs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I don't think that this can be considered free. The Doctor Who DVDs are definitely not de minimis. Stefan2 (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It shows the spines only, not the front covers (and certainly not the entire covers); there is insufficient to aid the activities of a DVD pirate. I would say that approximately 5% of each cover is actually depicted here. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Regardless of what portion of the case is used, the cover including the spine is copyright by the producer of the dvd (which is generally Warner Home Video for most of those and BBC Worldwide/2 Entertain for others). It is listed as public domain (even though it is not (should be FUR) and even still, the image does not pass WP:NFCC#8. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doctor Who DVD spines.jpg

File:Doctor Who DVD spines.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The cover including the spine is copyright by the producer of the dvd. It is listed as GDFL and CCSA3.0 (even though it is not (should be FUR) and the image does not pass WP:NFCC#8. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:44, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per ТимофейЛееСуда. Good that you spotted this. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I was verifying everything for my response on the previous nom, I saw there was an entire category for dr. who dvd covers. (odd category). Saw this one, same criteria. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:14, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Malaysian Army.svg

File:Flag of Malaysian Army.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The source link appears to be dead, but I don't think that this is exempt from copyright. I would believe that this is one of those things mentioned at {{PD-Malaysia}} where the copyright expires 50 years after publication. Stefan2 (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, but I created it, based on the flag available in the link. Syed ^(talk) 06:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Keep Just change the license to {{PD-user-w|en|wikipedia|Syed}}. — иz нίpнόp 07:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wu Jianquan.jpg

File:Wu Jianquan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The source appears to be an old copy of Wikipedia. It seems that the image was once at File:TCC Wu Chien-ch'uan 2.jpg, deleted after a Commons move to Commons:File:TCC Wu Chien-ch'uan 2.jpg and then deleted from Commons because it was "in category Unknown as of 10 October 2007 for more than 7 days, missing essential information". Could anyone check the old files and confirm whether they are the same and whether the deletions were correct? Stefan2 (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I found an larger version on this site. Doing some digging around, the guy who holds the copyright to the site (and most likely the content) also owns a Martial Arts Graphics site where he sells Martial Arts Graphics. I would think that if he holds the copyright to the image (which no one knows) he wouldn't let it go without fee. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corig4tet.jpg

File:Corig4tet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"The photo was provided courtesy of the Corigliano Quartet" conflicts with GFDL-self and no evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceva-Stemma.png

File:Ceva-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [1]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Provincia di Crotone-Stemma.png

File:Provincia di Crotone-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [2]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lissone-Stemma.png

File:Lissone-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [3]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PavoneCanavese.png

File:PavoneCanavese.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [4]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ome-Stemma.png

File:Ome-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [5]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dongo-Stemma.png

File:Dongo-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [6]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casatenovo-Stemma2.jpg

File:Casatenovo-Stemma2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [7]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gonars-Stemma.png

File:Gonars-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [8]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BadiaTedalda-Stemma.gif

File:BadiaTedalda-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [9]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reggio Emilia Stemma.gif

File:Reggio Emilia Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [10]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pratovecchio-Stemma.gif

File:Pratovecchio-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [11]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CanosadiPuglia-Stemma.gif

File:CanosadiPuglia-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [12]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciampino-Stemma.jpg

File:Ciampino-Stemma.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [13]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maceratafeltria-Stemma.gif

File:Maceratafeltria-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [14]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genga-Stemma.JPG

File:Genga-Stemma.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [15]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sestino-Stemma.gif

File:Sestino-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [16]. Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BarcellonaPozzodiGotto-Stemma.gif

File:BarcellonaPozzodiGotto-Stemma.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

CC-BY-NC-ND, see [17]. There are lots of more of these. Shall I just request F11 deletion of them all? Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as "see source" Bulwersator (talk) 08:27, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a minute... User talk:Attilios/Licenses says that images are released as "fair use". However, the page also links to it:Wikipedia:Autorizzazioni ottenute/Stemmi which quotes some e-mails. Reading it:Wikipedia:Autorizzazioni ottenute/Stemmi#Classificazione GFDL, someone claims that some images were listed as GFDL, and someone called Bruno Fracasso, possibly an Araldica Civica person, is asked if this is correct. Bruno Fracasso says that he accepts the licence (Va bene quella licenza. = That licence is fine.). So it seems that we have an authorisation from Araldica Civica, but that we need an individual authorisation from the municipal administration (see it:Wikipedia:Autorizzazioni ottenute/Stemmi#ATTENZIONE: L'autorizzazione del disegnatore non è sufficiente. È necessario richiedere all'amministrazione comunale competente l'autorizzazione all'utilizzo secondo quanto indicato alla pagina Progetto:Coordinamento/Immagini#Stemmi ≈ The authorisation from the artist isn't enough. It is necessary to ask the municipal administration for authorisation on the use as indicated on the page Progetto:Coordinamento/Immagini#Stemmi). So it seems that they should still be deleted, but for a different reason (no evidence of permission from the municipal administration). --Stefan2 (talk) 13:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On a second thought, if the problem is that we need permission from the municipal administrations of each municipality, I guess this makes the coats of arms similar to normal logos, i.e. irreplaceable by free images. Maybe we should keep the whole set as fair use. How would anyone feel about writing around 2000 fair use rationales? --Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]