Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood (programming language)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.242.207.186 (talk) at 03:33, 24 May 2010 (add sig, fix what ever i did to screw up another guy's bold face part). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Hollywood (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not encyclopedic. The product this article advertises is not well known and is not of any significance in the field it targets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koft (talkcontribs) 20:22, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

23-may-2010, Elwood:

I disagree because:

  • I don't see anything wrong with this information. Remember that:

Quote:

An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia) is a comprehensive written compendium that holds information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.

End quote.


  • As a programming language, Hollywood have the same rights as these:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scala_(programming_language)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_basic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.net

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMOS_(programming_language) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.145.134 (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

End, 23-may-2010, Elwood —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.80.148.37 (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an advertisement for a product, see http://amigaworld.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5442

"Hollywood now has its own entry at Wikipedia, the world's most popular encyclopedia. Here is the link so you can check it out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood (programming language). The article provides a good overview of what Hollywood can do, what platforms it supports, and a short history of the program. There is also a dedicated section about the popular Hollywood Designer add-on, which allows the easy creation of presentations and multimedia applications using a convenient GUI. Finally, I'd like to inform interested customers from overseas that the Euro is currently pretty weak in comparison to the US dollar, so for everyone who is thinking about purchasing Hollywood, now might be a good time to order." Koft (talk) 21:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the deletion because Hollywood was a great language! I use it daily and dont know whats the problem with that wikipedia entry... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxedo75 (talkcontribs) 21:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'*Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this programming language. Joe Chill (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Joe Chill. The issue we are discussing here is not whether Hollywood is a good or bad programming language. What we are discussing is whether it is a notable programming language. That is, have articles and/or books been published about it by persons who didn't create it or have a financial stake in the programming language? The articles Scala (programming language) and Visual Basic appear to have such independent sources cited showing notability of those languages. Maybe there are such sources about Hollywood too, but they need to be cited in order for participants here in this discussion to know that they exist. And if anyone can find such sources but doesn't know how to add them to the article, they can cite them here in this discussion which could at least confirm the existence of the sources (if they are relevant and useful). If such sources are provided, I may reconsider my recommendation. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Language is an embedded lang for a specific product that's virtually unknown. No references I can find have been written about it. 74.242.207.186 (talk) 03:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Hollywood is not yet notable enough for its own article. However, the article Amiga software needs a major overhaul to bring it up to date with recent developments. If it is deemed insufficiently notable, this Hollywood article should be condensed and merged with the broader Amiga software article, as Hollywood is certainly a major example of new Amiga software, and much-used within the Amiga community despite its lack of notability in the wider world. 188.74.93.216 (talk) 01:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]