Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddharth JAIN

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo article with non-notable references which mention the person concerned, but are not directly about him. Biker Biker (talk) 11:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 02:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. promotional article. all newspaper coverage cited is about the company's activities and not about the subject--Sodabottle (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & Expand. Subject is quoted / interviewed in all the articles and hence must be of some importance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.234.33 (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He's a marketing chap with a company, so obviously he's going to be quoted in context (which is what these "interviews" are - single line quotes), nothing else. Nothing about him anywhere. There are quite a few other people with the same name who appear to be notable. So, not going to pass WP:BIO. -SpacemanSpiff 20:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of notability. As indicated above, the alleged "interviews" are actually press release-type articles that do not count as WP:RS. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]