Jump to content

Talk:Encapsulation (computer science)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DarkseidX (talk | contribs) at 07:58, 11 August 2009 (Information hiding - redirect?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputer science Redirect‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Low quality

This page is of low quality. I'm however not knowledgeable enough to write a new version. 81.231.1.134 (talk) 19:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Since the above comment, the page has been rewritten). Mhkay (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Information hiding - redirect?

Shouldn't it redirect to Information Hiding? 152.78.174.19 (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of the references in the Information Hiding entry is an article called "Encapsulation is not Information Hiding". So probably no. But there should certainly be a cross-reference. Mhkay (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. This article is quite wrong and needs a rewrite. Here's the c2.com link referred to above: http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?EncapsulationIsNotInformationHiding DarkseidX (talk) 07:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The information in this article is so innacurate and misleading that I propose it be cut down to a single sentence pending an accurate article with references. DarkseidX (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]