Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammage
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) at 00:07, 26 September 2005 (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Grammage moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammage). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 00:07, 26 September 2005 by Uncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs) (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Grammage moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammage)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was routine delete as the final step in a successful transwiki. Rossami (talk) 21:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DicDef, Transwikied already, not likely to expand. Kevin Rector (talk) 16:15, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
- agreed. I'd have said transwiki, but it seems to already be there. Grutness|hello?
07:50, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply] - Keep Tony 03:35, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.