Jump to content

Talk:Ecodefense

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 02:27, 6 July 2008 (Signing comment by 71.243.205.199 - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconEnvironment
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A blurb on the ethics of Ecodefense might be in order. I dunno if it should or not--- one must avoid appearing to advocate instead of define and describe. Hummm. What to do, what to do.....

Since ecodefense is performed in the defense of all life, it is therefore not violent. This should be mentioned. I mentioned this in the monkeywrenching entry, but it should probably be stressed in ecodefense as well: the former is a subset of the latter, but the former is also independant of the latter. There's a hell of a lot of people engaging in monkeywrenching who are anti-life, anti-environment, and crazy: the CIA performed monkeywrenching in Central and South America. This faucet of monkeywrenching should probably be added to the monkeywrenching page. Hummm. I'll have to give it some thought. Desertphile 06:21 13 Jul 2003 (UTC)


BBUUUUUSSSSHHHHHH!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.243.205.199 (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]