Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Create article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ABCD (talk | contribs) at 16:13, 3 April 2005 (close discussion: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 16:13, 3 April 2005 by ABCD (talk | contribs) (close discussion: delete)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 16:13, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non notable. Inter\Echo 16:13, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Note The two articles, Diana_al-hadid and Create article currently have identical content. Dpbsmith (talk) 16:46, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Speedying the "Create article" version as it's a content fork. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:51, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Although she gets 1540 Google hits, only 19 are displayed; the rest are suppressed as "very similar." It appears as if the other 1500-odd are all repetitive content from a Richmond tourist-bureau site that repeatedly featured one art event in its "upcoming attractions." No hits in Google Groups. No hits in Google News. At best, locally notable in Richmond, Virginia. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:37, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, possible promo. Megan1967 02:09, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, clay-cruft. dbenbenn | talk 00:09, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Article does not establish notability, but this artist is mentioned in at least one journal, making her notable IMO. --Smithfarm
- Delete, non-notable. The very idea that every person who was ever mentioned in any newspaper should have an article is laughable. RickK 08:19, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Clarification. What you say is true, but it's not what I said. Art journals are not newspapers. In the art world, being mentioned in a trade journal is a sign that one is on the up-and-up. Sorry I didn't clarify this. That said, I'm not familiar with the journal she got mentioned in; maybe the journal itself is not notable. --Smithfarm
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.