Jump to content

User talk:Mikeycdiamond

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 21:17, 1 November 2025 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Mikeycdiamond/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Survey

[edit]

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond. FYI I found your participation via XTools.Czarking0 (talk) 02:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC closing update

[edit]

Two weeks ago, the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard, we have our winners. Bronze Belt Buckle – 3rd place vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions), continuing his work on covering abortion in Africa, comes in third with 692 points. Silver Belt Buckle – 2nd place simongraham (submissions) comes in second with 763 points, largely from a slew of good articles about jumping spiders. And returning to the podium for the second year in a row, Gold Belt Buckle – 1st place Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) takes the Gold Belt Buckle with a mind-boggling 946 points from his series of articles on sportpersons. Congratulations to our winners!

Amazingly, the award for the most countries covered goes to both Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) and simongraham (submissions), who each submitted articles under 30 flags! Bosnia and Herzegovina BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins for writing the most quality articles (16 good articles). For submitting 16 articles related to El Salvador, El Salvador PizzaKing13 (submissions) wins the award for most submissions under one country. The award for most submissions related to women goes to both Spookyaki (submissions) (7 biographies about women) and vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) (21 related articles). And for the second year, simongraham (submissions) wins for the most reviews, having submitted 21!

Among the participants' contributions were 2 FAs, 5 FLs, 124 GAs, and an uncounted number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No Kings Day October 18th 2025

[edit]

So I added in the Nevada section sense that was excluded. If you looked at the No Kings website the day before you would’ve seen several events in Nevada planned. You have deleted crucial information for the understanding of how widespread the movement is. Nevada did not just sit it out. It did participate. The Nevada section must be restored. Stardust1259 (talk) 02:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources (while isn't necessary, reading it would further explain our policies). I understand your concern, but no sources were cited. Also, the No Kings Day website isn't a reliable source. If you want to readd the section, you can make a proposed edit at Talk:No Kings protests (October 2025). Mikeycdiamond (talk) 02:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

[edit]
And the "Global Resource Distribution Committee" emerges.
Two shortlisted WMF Board candidates removed from the ballot.
Who was bumped and why?
...while Musk prepares to launch "Grokipedia".
Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
Don't get too excited before you read this.

DYK for Sergeant Siwash

[edit]

On 29 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sergeant Siwash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a duck named Sergeant Siwash fought the Japanese in World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sergeant Siwash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sergeant Siwash), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

--Launchballer 00:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 20,234 views (843.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]