Jump to content

Draft talk:Questionable research practices

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk | contribs) at 15:21, 31 March 2025 (→Draft: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Fraud

I don't think that Fraud belongs here; on my understanding "questionable research practises" are necessarily "questionable" generally not understood to be illegitimate by the protagonists, through ignorance or naivety. Some for example don't see what's so wrong with citing evidence that supports their claim while ignoring inconvenient evidence. Many have a poor understanding of statistical tests, and assume that if other papers have used a procedure then it has to be OK. Fraud however is unquestionably illegitimate.92.161.213.98 (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

@Nbreznau: I reverted your conversion to a content article, citing WP:OR issues. Please consider working on a WP:Draft version first. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Questionable_research_practices&oldid=1283285626"