Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 92.24.230.78 (talk) at 12:32, 8 October 2023 (Adding new request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

This request is reasonable, but there are some other articles that might have an impact on whether the move is viable. In addition to Sturgeon Falls (electoral district), I also found Sturgeon Falls Education Crisis and Sturgeon Falls 23. There also some redirects involving junior hockey teams from the area that later changed their names. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the title is indeed ambiguous, then Sturgeon Falls should be a disambiguation page, not a primary redirect. For the record, I agree with OP. I've added a hatnote to Sturgeon Falls 23; that should be sufficient. 162 etc. (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

A google search comes back with mostly capitalized results. Bensci54 (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The previous RM makes this WP:PCM. Use the normal discussion process. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Justinletterasst: Daniella Perkins appears to be her WP:COMMONNAME. It's the name under which she is credited in her work and by which she is referred in references. It's also the main name on her Youtube channel, so she doesn't seem to have stopped using Perkins. See WP:NAMECHANGES WP:SPNC. This would require a requested-move discussion (and some supporting evidence). SilverLocust 💬 21:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Daniella Taylor should probably be a redirect at least. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this was recently at TR and not moved. In any case, it is plausibly controversial. Use the "discuss" link to start a normal RM discussion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdewman6 (talkcontribs) 03:09, October 8, 2023 (UTC)
This is not uncontroversial, I oppose it. Click the "discuss" link and remove your request here if you want to continue. Polyamorph (talk) 07:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed