Jump to content

User talk:Fathoms Below/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Fathoms Below
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 10:08, 30 March 2023 (Archiving 3 discussions from User talk:The Night Watch. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, CollectiveSolidarity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Greyjoy talk 22:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CollectiveSolidarity! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:14, Sunday, April 17, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Incomprehensibility

I suspect that when you wrote "comprehensive prose and wording" on your user page, you meant to write something else. -- Hoary (talk) 23:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I do not understand what you mean by this. Please, can you be more concise with your statement? CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Concision is indeed admirable. And comprehensiveness of prose is sometimes close to its antonym. Did you perhaps mean to write "comprehensible prose and wording"? -- Hoary (talk) 04:51, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you. I should be trouted for something silly like that. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Don't worry about it. I'm sure I've done much worse. (When sleepy, I even confuse "their" and "they're".) -- Hoary (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

IP 2603’s personal attacks

On the Multiverse of Madness talkpage, the comment starting with “You wanna know something really interesting?”, does it fall under WP:NOPA?--CreecregofLife (talk) 02:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Possibly. It certainly does sound rude. However, it must appear as a deliberate/straightforward statement or else the sysops may not consider it as a personal attack. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
"So you acting like some be-all-end-all authority on the matter, it's beyond ridiculous. I'm an anon user, yes, but at this point, even I can tell you to go sit in a time out."
Seems pretty direct to me CreecregofLife (talk) 02:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Go for it then. be bold. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Apparently, someone decided to tattle to ANI on me? By a newly registered user who apparently held a weeks-long grudge about a reversion I made, and then called my presence on the MoM talkpage "toxic" CreecregofLife (talk) 04:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Obviously the reporter is the anonymous IP. You had the right to condemn this personal attack, because this editor is making extreme accusations. I highly doubt that this newly-created account is from “someone else” in the IP’s household, and they should have never reported you when they started the personal attack. The editor should receive a warning, but please refrain from strong emotions. I try to always WP:ASG, but it is not a good look to have an outburst on ANI. I believe that you have improved from your past in edit warring, but others may not. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
It’s just exhausting and angering to be having to keep defending myself like this, and then be condemned for having a “battleground attitude” and no self-reflection. Like, what am I supposed to do when they handcuff my arguments like that? Nothing I say or do matters. They constantly demand i self-reflect but have yet to reflect on how I’ve actually been treated. I’ve had multiple users come at me with petty underhanded tactics and personal attacks just because I tried to be reasonable with them, or in other cases saw through some bigoted arguments and they’re taken aback when they’re called out on it. I shouldn’t be punished for getting loud and angry. I didn’t resort to insults, I didn’t curse. They won’t even try to understand what brought me to that point because all they see in me is bad CreecregofLife (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi CollectiveSolidarity! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, WikiFauna, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Trouted

a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Please see this diff. Mistakes do happen, so... — B. L. I. R. 02:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

I’ve been trouted at last! I am so happy! Thank you! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hi CollectiveSolidarity. I find it strange to have to tell you this, but please refrain from blanking talk page sections like you did here, especially after others (myself in this case) have commented. Please be advised that repeating this behavior may result in loss of editing privileges. Thanks, FASTILY 06:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Quite ironic on my part, but I understand. It will not happen again. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi CollectiveSolidarity! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Rewriting File Information, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi CollectiveSolidarity! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Archiving sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)


DYK for Frankie Saluto

On 21 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frankie Saluto, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frankie Saluto was a member of the Ringling Giants, a dwarf baseball team that raised money for charity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frankie Saluto. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frankie Saluto), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Regents

Theresa wasn’t regent for her son, she was a countess in her own right — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.192.18 (talk) 15:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

But she was also was the acting as Queen of Portugal while her son was just a child, that is what a regent is. Next time, explain this in an edit summary. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 15:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Kevin Durant

Why you delete my edits for KD? Don’t you see that I have attached the reference? You loser please stop doing foolish things. Dreamkd (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

You added commentary to that article, as Bagumba said on your talk page. To Quote Bagumba :
"While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum."
Also please do not call me a loser. That is a personal attack, and Wikipedia forbids that. Thank you, CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Murcielago SV production

Hi CollectiveSolidarity, One of the sources I referenced is an actual Lamborghini historian, (However, I can delete the other two sources, which were taken from two people who are not historians) who is extremely knowledgable when it comes to these types of cars. As the reliable source section states, "media must be produced by a reliable source" I'd say John Temerian is considered to be a reliable source when it comes to these types of things. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROCKSTAR HELLA (talk • contribs) 21:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

I would take your word for it, but per WP:RSPYT, sources from YouTube should not be used at all. If you could find a reliable source that is not from YouTube, then you can include it in the article. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Alright! Let me see if I'm able to find something not from youtube ROCKSTAR HELLA (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Newspapers.com

I'm not recalling how to go about it, but the WMF will pay subscription fees for sites like that. We also have a forum just for newer editors called The Teahouse. The volunteers there will be glad to help you find those resources. 174.212.229.61 (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me this. I have not asked any questions at the teahouse yet (I prefer to read the Manual of Style) but I will ask if this service is available. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
I didn't realize you were so new. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
There is also something called the Wikipedia Library that gives access to library databases. There is a minimum amount of participation to become eligible though; I am not sure what it is but the Teahouse would know. I am also willing to help if you want but the Teahouse is more official. Elinruby (talk)<

Steep

It isn’t really an editorializing word, you know, just an adjective. I didn’t revert you because people revert too much, and I don’t have actual objections to “major” except that it might possibly be a bit trite. I don’t think it’s an improvement but it’s also not wrong, basically. But ok, I did want to talk to you about it a little. If you somehow graphed the violence of the war over time, whether based on deaths, or missile strikes, economic costs, or whatever, the graph would go sharply up, so in this case the word is actually objective.

I like the way you are thinking; when I edit for neutral point of view I sometimes use an edit summary that says “removing adjectives”. I am just at loose ends for a moment and so taking the time to point out to you that while editorializing uses adjectives, not all adjectives are editorializing.

I realize that I probably sound like I’m overthinking this. Welcome to Wikipedia ;) One of my self-assigned wiki missions is keeping that article small enough to add on to still, because the war isn’t over yet, so I have been giving quite a bit of thought to its wording, especially in the lede, shrug. I hope this friendly quibble is coming across as a friendly quibble as it is intended to, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia;) Elinruby (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I understand. But next time, please do not include such a long section over a minor revert. It comes across as condescending. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 15:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I didn’t revert it. And I was trying, apparently too hard, not to sound condescending. In any event, have a nice day. Elinruby (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Oromo expansion

Why do accounts like this seem to always revert edits and do their worthless moderation without actually reading the content? Are they bots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:280:CB02:1C79:146E:722B:2C2B:5CC7 (talk) 03:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I perceived that the Oromo migrations article had still not adequately addressed its lack of citations and original research. Your reason for removing the tags was that they were “too old”, which does not necessarily mean that they should be removed. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 04:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
But weve put effort into using multiple references over the course of the last couple months. So I need to create an account? 2601:280:CB02:1C79:146E:722B:2C2B:5CC7 (talk) 04:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The page currently heavily relies upon the source “Pankhurst 1997”, which is why I maintained the tag. Some other additions did not have adequate citations as well. You don’t have to create an account to help with the article, but I would recommend it. Just remember, you can use only one account while editing, so don’t use your IP again if you create one. Doing so would be considered sockpuppetry. Cheers! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 04:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi CollectiveSolidarity. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 02:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Fastily! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

United States

Hi. Apologies for being harsh in an edit summary. The rollback will create lots of add-backs, and these were some of them which should stand well. Kind of a mess which editors will have to compare to see what good edits were removed. Thanks for your patience. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Ha, we crossed in talk page message. Very appreciated, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Mobile editing is a bit quirky with rollback, so again, my apologies for misclicking! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. I've never edited on mobile (and only looked on Wikipedia once on it, when someone was showing me a page) so can only imagine how hard it would be in some situations. You were only being vigilant, commendable. I also have to assume that many of the scores of edits rolled back by someone else were very good ones, and hopefully many will be returned either by the original editor or by people checking the edits. Nice to meet you along the road. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Mz7 (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Rash of edits again....and one very unique addition

this and this make me think something is funny. 15+ years never seen this.Moxy- 01:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

@Moxy Perhaps an investigation must be taken. It does appear to be awfully suspicious. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 01:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exit the Gungeon has been accepted

Exit the Gungeon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Added your guestbook on Jack's list

Hi... I have added your guestbook here on your behalf. Feel free to undo it. Happy editing Volten001 ☎ 16:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

September music

September songs

Thank you for improving articles in September! Yesterday, we sang old music for two choirs at church, pictured, scroll to the image of the organ of the month of the Diocese of Limburg (my perspective), and if you have time, watch the video about it. And today I wrote an article about music premiered today, Like as the hart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Interesting new user name! . How about mentioning that one for WP:QAI? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Fathoms Below,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Thedefender35

Just wanted to let you know I claimed one of your mentee's after a talk page discussion with them. I'm going to help them learn the ropes of editing and creating content through a series of lessons in an effort to avoid any further sanctions and aid them in growth and development. Should you object or should they decide to no longer accept my assistance I will return them to you as a mentee. --ARoseWolf 18:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Take care and good luck. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 01:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

October thanks

October songs

Thank you for improving articles in October! - Look for mine: two favourite concerts were on DYK, and too many on RD (three yesterday). -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from LZorrer (05:59, 26 October 2022)

I just made a draft about a chess opening variation and i want to publish it, how can i do it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mikenas_Defense:_Lithuanian_Variation --LZorrer (talk) 05:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

@LZorrer Hello there! I think you should wait a bit before publishing it. Articles require multiple sources that establish notability, in short it means answering the criteria : Does this article contain at least two reliable sources that are independent that talk about the subject in detail (significant coverage)? If so, then you can most likely publish an article on it.
Chessgames.com doesn't appear to provide enough information to support the facts in the Theory and Origin sections, so I suggest finding some sources and citing those sections. After you material is properly sourced, you can submit the article by pressing "Submit this Draft For review" on the page banner I added to your draft, letting one of our volunteers check it and then publish it when it is ready. But if you cannot find enough sources to meet notability, you could also just put material about the Lithuanian variation at the article Queen's Knight Defense. If you have any other questions, the Teahouse is a good place to go. Cheers! ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elden Ring

The article Elden Ring you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elden Ring for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 04:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Question from TamarToronto (04:11, 13 November 2022)

Hi :( I’ve been trying to create this page for four months. --TamarToronto (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

@TamarToronto Hello there! First, you appear to have a connection to the subject, so that means you have a conflict of interest and must disclose your COI. Also, if you are paid for your contributions to this draft, you must declare so. After that, I suggest that you try reading Your first article and looking at the posts on your talk page. The article is currently heavily reliant on sources closely related to your subject, and the article needs at least two reliable, independent sources. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 05:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your input. Yes, I thought I declare that on my main page. I’m not sure where else I should clear it. I definitely am not getting any money lol I will go and read that article again which I did but I will. I do understand the sources issue .

Thank you very much TamarToronto (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Question from Bafflab on Help:Searching (01:23, 15 November 2022)

Hello, how do i delete my account --Bafflab (talk) 01:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

@Bafflab Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. It is impossible to delete an account, but you can nonetheless stop using it. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 01:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghost Song (video game) (2) (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ghost Song (video game), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm sorry for missing your draft earlier (I had just named my draft Ghost Song since I had forgotten the video game suffix). I believe your draft was a little older then mine, and had I noticed it when planning the draft, I would have contributed to that draft instead of starting from scratch. Thank you for your time, and sorry for missing that. Mbrickn (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
No worries ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, The Night Watch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Longing

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Longing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 21:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

review is being written at this time.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

De-also-ification

Hi The Night Watch,

Great to see that de-also-ification is catching on! Oftentimes it's an unnecessary word. Recently I stumbled upon Hitman 3, where I removed also 24 times. There's one downside though: now you can't unsee it any other articles. Thanks, and happy de-also-ification. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Enter the Gungeon

The article Enter the Gungeon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Enter the Gungeon for comments about the article, and Talk:Enter the Gungeon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

November thanks

November songs

Thank you for improving articles in November while I was on vacation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Prakash Bhende

Hello, The Night Watch,

I was looking over the AFD discussion on this article and while it very well might be deleted, you tagged it for AFD 21 minutes after it was created. That is not enough time for even the best content creator to write a decent article and source it properly.

In the future, please do not be so quick to send newly created articles to AFD. Allow the article creator a few hours or even a day (or longer!) to pull together a version of an article that might survive a deletion discussion. While its preferred that editors create articles and develop them over time in their sandbox or Draft space, some editors prefer to write directly into main space and it's nearly impossible to write a decent article that quickly. As I said, it could be that this article subject is not notable and the article will be deleted, but unless there is really troublesome content (BLP violations, copyright problems, advertising, etc.), please do not be so quick to tag a newly created article for an AFD discussion. Thank you, in advance, for taking into consideration the concerns of content creators and new editors. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Liz. I will keep that in mind for the future.
Also, thank you for all the good work you do at AfD. It's a slog, but I'm thankful that closers like you do a good job. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kingdom Two Crowns

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kingdom Two Crowns you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shooterwalker -- Shooterwalker (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - December 2022

Hey, The Night Watch! Here is the December 2022 issue for the TheWikiWizard! We've been dormant for a few months!

Humor

  • How many times will you write 2022 in 2023??
  • Don't write Christmas Cards/do gift shopping in December, do it in the summer!

Wiki(p/m)edia News

Not much to report this issue, but we do have these to report!

  • Quite a few RFAs took place since the last issue of this newsletter. You can view more here!
  • The Voting for a sound logo is taking place on Wikimedia Commons, head over to that link to find out more!
  • The Arbitration Committee Elections is happening on the English Wikipedia. (The elections may have finished by the time you see this message, please check the page for the date and time of the election deadline)

Editor's Notes

  • Have a great holiday and new years! We'll see you in 2023.


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you next time. Happy Holidays! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This issue was delivered to you with MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on 02:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from Jihad rajabi on OpenAI (00:35, 15 December 2022)

فعليات عن العمل الجماعي --Jihad rajabi (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I cannot understand this. Can you please ask this question in English if possible? ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from Carlpedro94 (06:59, 19 December 2022)

Hello, how do I create a new article? --Carlpedro94 (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

@Carlpedro94 Hello there! There are a few ways to create a new article, but the most straightforward way is to read Help:Your first article and follow the directions there. But creating an article is tricky for new editors like yourself, and I recommend that you take a look at the Wikipedia:Task Center and see if there are smaller tasks that you’d like to help out with. But if you are interested in creating an article right now, you should read Help:Your first article and then use the Article wizard to create a draft article. If you have any questions, you can ask me or post a question to The Teahouse, an area where more experience editors can answer questions. Cheers! The Night Watch (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023!

Hello The Night Watch, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023.
Happy editing,
JOEBRO64 14:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

JOEBRO64 14:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Joe! Merry Christmas to you and your family as well! The Night Watch (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Moving pages to draftspace

Hi, when reviewing pages, please don't move everything into draftspace. Sometimes it's suitable when a page needs more than tagging and cleanup in mainspace, for things like Draft:Green Entertainment, just CSD it. Try to avoid using draftification as a 6-month PROD. Anarchyte (talk) 06:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Anarchyte. Though perhaps you should check the author, as they appear to have created similar pages that may also need to be G11ed. Once again, thank you and happy holidays. The Night Watch (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fathoms_Below/Archive_1&oldid=1147344642"