This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comparison of cross-platform instant messaging clients article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 31 days

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Withdrawn by nominator, March 14, 2011, see discussion.
Keep, January 11, 2007, see discussion.
Keep, September 15, 2004, see discussion.

The content of Comparison of XMPP clients was merged into Comparison of cross-platform instant messaging clients. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Internet List‑class Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Telecommunications List‑class Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

IRC (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject IRC, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.IRCWikipedia:WikiProject IRCTemplate:WikiProject IRCIRC

Clients without a corresponding Wikipedia article are subject to immediate removal from this article. Before adding a client, ensure that it has an existing article, or create the article if the client meets the general notability guideline.

Additional Software

Riot.im, Hoccer and Kontalk could also be added to the charts. 94.220.154.71 (talk) 08:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Each of those three messengers should have a Wikipedia article first. See WP:WTAF. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ring fits that criterion. 94.220.152.66 (talk) 07:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about Tox? --riveravaldez (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a protocol, not a client. If a client is released we'll add it. Brainfrogk4mon (talk) 08:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Im+ could also be added to the list of programs. 83.150.96.149 (talk) 08:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A few more instant messaging clients: https://www.androidheadlines.com/2013/09/top-10-best-im-instant-message-apps-android.html and https://www.androidpit.com/best-instant-messenger-apps-for-android 83.150.96.149 (talk) 09:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cyph would be a good one to add for the secure messengers section. 23.243.26.182 (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These messaging apps do not meet this article's inclusion criteria. Before adding a client, ensure that it has a corresponding Wikipedia article, or create the article first using the software notability essay as a guideline. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 09:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm surprised not to see Google Hangouts in this page... an oversight ? And what about adding a column to specify which of them use cloud messaging or not ? It has huge consequences (cross platform, environmental impact...) Jabuz72 (talk) 00:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Viber hasn't updated its linux package since version 12. While linux is still downloadable from the Viber website, its .pkg doesn't install on recent Ubuntu releases. Linux should probably be changed to "partial". Krolaw (talk) 11:49, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linux is not "Ubuntu". I mean, if they just miss a release or an update. Brainfrogk4mon (talk) 09:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There should be added Delta Chat to this comparison too - https://delta.chat/en/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.29.129.183 (talk) 00:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article looks like this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_cross-platform_instant_messaging_clients&oldid=922997158

this is what it looked like before the renovation. Just why.

More info in the table. But I agree it makes it far harder to read. --gilgongo (talk) 08:23, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done some changes. — kashmīrī ^TALK 09:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SMS/MMS support? Does the messaging app support both/either (in addition to any proprietary format)?

I would welcome a new section or an additional column (or two) to one of the existing sections detailing whether SMS and/or MMS is supported by the app, perhaps in the section with information about the format(s) currently supported. 47.150.34.85 (talk) 22:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]