Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qi (programming language)

Looks like vanity article. Certainly, notability hasn't been shown or proven. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Running it through Yahoo! brought a few results in, worth letting sit for a week and seeing if the author fleshes it out any further. Not to say it is still anything of note, but a Google group devoted to the subject was in the listing. --Ozgod 05:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, but mark as unsourced to speed up nomination if no sources are added Alf^Photoman 22:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article was tagged for deletion an hour after it was created. The creator is also a new user, so this may qualify as WP:BITE--though I don't think it was deliberate on the part of the nominator. Rather than nominating the article for deletion, it would have been more constructive to notify the author of any WP:N, WP:V, or other concerns. -- Black Falcon 04:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]