Jump to content

Wikipedia:Problems with Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CesarB (talk | contribs) at 20:41, 19 February 2007 (Recent changes overload: possible solution: more automation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I do not believe that Wikipedia is failing. However, nothing is perfect; there are several places where Wikipedia can be improved. I'm creating this page as a centralized place where the problems with Wikipedia can be listed, and a solution found. Since the focus of this page is to find a solution, problems without a solution (like world peace the end of vandalism on Wikipedia) are not useful additions, nor are problems which are already solved (or that are not actually a problem in the first place).

Recent changes overload

The amount of edits per minute on the Recent changes keeps increasing; more and more vandalism is starting to slip through the cracks. Not only that, but the time until it's fixed is also increasing (sometimes over a week on particularly egregious vandalism; for instance [1] which was only reverted 11 revisions later [2]). The amount of deletion backlogs is also growing.

Possible solutions

  • More automation.

Poor documentation

A lot of the documentation on how things should be done on Wikipedia is hard to find, missing, incomplete, outdated, confusing, or even downright wrong. This is not much of a problem for experienced editors (who can usually, after just one or two tries, guess the correct words which, when prefixed by WP:, Wikipedia:, or Help:, lead to a helpful redirect), but can be a stumbling block for new users. The several variations of welcome templates help, but not every new user gets one of them.

Possible solutions

Problem editors

Blatant vandalism can be dealt with quickly; however, some problem people can drive other editors away from an article, a subject, or even the whole Wikipedia, without doing something which would lead to being blocked for more than a few hours each time. These problem people usually do not contribute to the improvement of Wikipedia (they often do the opposite), while the editors they drive away usually would make a positive effect.

Possible solutions

See also