Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Python Software Foundation
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Python Software Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
almost no independent references DGG ( talk ) 09:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as I am quite sure the foundation responsible for one of the most popular programming languages[1][2][3] is sufficiently notable. It isn't unusual for a software platform to have a foundation article, such as Apache, .NET and F# to name a few. The fact the article needs development and additional referencing isn't a suitable rationale for removal. Bungle (talk • contribs) 16:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- thereferences you cite are about the language, notthe foundation. Nobody is challenging that Python is notable . DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- I am aware the cites are for the language, which is why I say immediately beforehand "one of the most popular programming languages". I do feel this is a fairly important consideration. The foundation is responsible for it. If the AfD sways towards deletion, which I hope it doesn't, it could well question the integrity of the other "foundation" articles aforementioned. This article, like so many others, would indeed benefit from additional 3rd party referencing, but I don't accept the fairly vague rationale offered. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- thereferences you cite are about the language, notthe foundation. Nobody is challenging that Python is notable . DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Merge or Redirect into Python (programming language). Based off of my reading of the sources, I can't say that the two would be independently notable. I also don't think that the Python language article is so long that length would become a problem. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep certainly shouldn't be deleted outright; I don't think a merge to Python (programming language) would be an editorial improvement. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)