Jump to content

Wheeler–Kenyon method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 20wiha19 (talk | contribs) at 15:11, 3 April 2021 (I changed the illustratin image. The Image used, was not related interms of archaeological method to this article. I inserted an image that shows quadratic trenches in Wheeler-Kenyon style). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
A Square Unit of an Exploration 02

The Wheeler–Kenyon method is a method of archaeological excavation. The technique draws its origins from the work of Mortimer Wheeler and Tessa Wheeler at Verulamium (1930–35), and was later refined by Kathleen Kenyon during her excavations at Jericho (1952–58). The Wheeler–Kenyon system involves digging within a series of squares that can vary in size set within a larger grid. This leaves a freestanding wall of earth—known as a "balk" that can range from 50 cm for temporary grids, and measure up to 2 m. in width for a deeper square. The Normal width of a permanent balk is 1 m.[1]—on each side of a unit. These vertical slices of earth allow archaeologists to compare the exact provenance of a found object or feature to adjacent layers of earth ("strata"). During Kenyon's excavations at Jericho, this technique helped discern the long and complicated occupational history of the site. It was believed that this approach allowed more precise stratigraphic observations than earlier "horizontal exposure" techniques which relied on architectural and ceramic analysis.

an archaeological excavation at moza. General view of an area with a semi oblique perspective showing mostly square excavation trenches arranged in a checkerboard pattern in a mediterranean landscape.
Excavation at Moza, Israel

References

  1. ^ Dever, Lance, et al. A Manual of Field Excavation. New York: Jewish Institute of Religion, 1982. Print. pp.50-51

Sources

  • Joseph A. Callaway, "Dame Kathleen Kenyon 1906-1978," The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 42, No. 2. (Spring, 1979), pp. 122–125.
  • jstor.org
  • online.vkrp.org