User talk:Dcoetzee/Wikicode/Specification: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 16:0616:06, 9 February 2010 P3d0 talk contribs m 89,715 bytes +30 User:P3d0 is now User:Doradus, replaced: User:P3d0|P3d0 → User:Doradus|Doradus (5) using AWB undo

curprev 16:3716:37, 25 September 2006 Gwern talk contribs m 89,685 bytes +26 Robot-assisted disambiguation (you can help!): STL undo

curprev 04:1704:17, 3 June 2006 Marudubshinki talk contribs m 89,659 bytes +24 Robot-assisted disambiguation: ML undo

curprev 17:3617:36, 16 June 2005 Dcoetzee talk contribs 89,635 bytes +8 Fix more links undo
curprev 17:2417:24, 16 June 2005 Dcoetzee talk contribs 89,627 bytes +40 Fix links undo
curprev 17:2217:22, 16 June 2005 Dcoetzee talk contribs 89,587 bytes +87 No longer proposed undo

curprev 19:1419:14, 2 June 2005 Dcoetzee talk contribs 89,500 bytes +205 Tfd notice undo

curprev 10:2310:23, 11 April 2005 Daniel Quinlan talk contribs 89,295 bytes +254 →A different proposal undo
curprev 10:0510:05, 11 April 2005 Daniel Quinlan talk contribs 89,041 bytes +1,956 a new proposal undo

curprev 14:0214:02, 1 April 2005 141.162.101.151 talk 87,085 bytes +185 Block delimiting -- suggested Fortran 90 as a model undo

curprev 07:0607:06, 20 January 2005 Home Row Keysplurge talk contribs 86,900 bytes −273 rv edits by self, should have looked at the bloody timestamps. undo
curprev 07:0307:03, 20 January 2005 Home Row Keysplurge talk contribs 87,173 bytes +273 →non-binding straw poll undo

curprev 17:0117:01, 30 December 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 83,036 bytes +349 →Aiee!: Response undo
curprev 12:2412:24, 30 December 2004 Dysprosia talk contribs 82,687 bytes +179 == Aiee! == We specify an indent style in the wikicode? That's awful. We should let writers use their own indent style. ~~~~ undo

curprev 19:1519:15, 21 December 2004 Mshonle~enwiki talk contribs 82,508 bytes +819 →Block delimiting: Knuth had the right idea on this undo

curprev 06:2506:25, 27 November 2004 Nvrmnd talk contribs 81,689 bytes −356 No edit summary undo
curprev 02:0302:03, 27 November 2004 Nvrmnd talk contribs 82,045 bytes +3 No edit summary undo
curprev 02:0302:03, 27 November 2004 Nvrmnd talk contribs 82,042 bytes +353 No edit summary undo

curprev 19:3919:39, 16 November 2004 65.96.161.91 talk 81,689 bytes +805 →Changes undo

curprev 16:0416:04, 15 November 2004 Ciphergoth2 talk contribs 80,884 bytes +34 Voted for Python undo

curprev 19:1919:19, 11 November 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 80,850 bytes 0 Re Jamesday undo
curprev 19:1919:19, 11 November 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 80,850 bytes +1,080 Re Jamesday undo

curprev 13:2813:28, 10 November 2004 Jamesday talk contribs 79,770 bytes +337 →Changes: Still preserves the key problems of the proposal, reduction of the variety of languages and pseudocode styles used. undo

curprev 10:2110:21, 14 October 2004 Markhurd talk contribs 79,433 bytes +187 →non-binding straw poll: No standard undo
curprev 08:4308:43, 14 October 2004 Securiger talk contribs 79,246 bytes +1,362 →A bad idea undo
curprev 08:1308:13, 14 October 2004 Securiger talk contribs 77,884 bytes +56 →non-binding straw poll undo

curprev 22:1422:14, 13 October 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 77,828 bytes +544 Re: Vote undo
curprev 20:4220:42, 13 October 2004 Cynical talk contribs 77,284 bytes +193 →Another objection to the whole idea of Wikicode undo
curprev 20:4120:41, 13 October 2004 Cynical talk contribs 77,091 bytes +51 Get rid of wikicode undo

curprev 10:1610:16, 10 October 2004 Markhurd talk contribs 77,040 bytes +372 Background wikilinks undo

curprev 13:4913:49, 5 October 2004 81.200.225.99 talk 76,668 bytes +52 →non-binding straw poll undo

curprev 18:2418:24, 4 October 2004 Wrp103 talk contribs 76,616 bytes +904 →Changes: my 1.5 cents undo
curprev 02:5602:56, 4 October 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 75,712 bytes +736 →Changes: Response again undo
curprev 01:0701:07, 4 October 2004 Wile E. Heresiarch talk contribs m 74,976 bytes +797 →Changes: another followup undo

curprev 01:1901:19, 3 October 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 74,179 bytes +2,027 →Changes: My response undo

curprev 21:5721:57, 2 October 2004 Wile E. Heresiarch talk contribs 72,152 bytes +1,213 →Changes: followup undo
curprev 01:2201:22, 2 October 2004 Dcoetzee talk contribs 70,939 bytes +440 →Changes: What my changes are undo

curprev 16:4416:44, 30 September 2004 The Anome talk contribs 67,578 bytes +630 →A bad idea: No, the whole idea of using x86 assembler would be to show the gnarliness of the low-level environment. You wouldn't use an assembler example for anything except something that needed undo
curprev 04:4004:40, 30 September 2004 Dysprosia talk contribs m 66,948 bytes +188 : x86 assembler? Are you insane? :) (Well, basic assembler shouldn't be a problem, but the whole x86 architecture is arcane as hell) ~~~~ undo

9 February 2010

25 September 2006

3 June 2006

16 June 2005

2 June 2005

11 April 2005

1 April 2005

20 January 2005

31 December 2004

30 December 2004

21 December 2004

27 November 2004

16 November 2004

15 November 2004

11 November 2004

10 November 2004

14 October 2004

13 October 2004

10 October 2004

5 October 2004

4 October 2004

3 October 2004

2 October 2004

1 October 2004

30 September 2004