https://de.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=PandroidWikipedia - Benutzerbeiträge [de]2025-05-03T20:25:28ZBenutzerbeiträgeMediaWiki 1.44.0-wmf.27https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manosphere&diff=199239982Manosphere2016-11-16T11:34:38Z<p>Pandroid: 6 months and no real case has been made on the talk page to justify it's inclusion here.</p>
<hr />
<div><br />
The '''manosphere''' ([[portmanteau]] of ''[[man]]'' and ''[[sphere]]'') or '''androsphere'''<ref name="androsphere">{{cite news|last=Wilson|first=Jason|title=The 'man-o-sphere' is outraged about Mad Max? Hand me my popcorn!|work=The Guardian| url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/15/the-man-o-sphere-is-outraged-about-mad-max-hand-me-my-popcorn}}</ref> (from {{lang-grc|ἀνήρ}}, ''anēr'', [[genitive]] {{lang|grc|ἀνδρός}}, ''andros'', "man") is a name given to a loose and informal network of [[blog]]s, [[Internet forum|forum]]s<ref name="wp"/> and [[website]]s, with internet commentators focusing on issues relating to men and [[masculinity]], as a male counterpart to [[feminism]] or in opposition to it. Many of these are [[men's spaces]]. Their content is varied, and includes [[Men Going Their Own Way]] (MGTOW),<ref>[https://www.mgtow.com/manosphere/ The Manosphere]</ref> [[men's rights]] issues, [[fathers' rights movement]] activists, and male victims of [[abuse]],<ref name="reddit"/> [[self-improvement]], [[bodybuilding]], [[antifeminism]], [[seduction community]] commentary for [[pick-up artists]].<ref name="wp">{{cite web|last=Dewey|first=Caitlin|date=27 May 2014|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2014/05/27/inside-the-manosphere-that-inspired-santa-barbara-shooter-elliot-rodger/|title=Inside the 'manosphere' that inspired Santa Barbara shooter Elliot Rodger|work=[[Washington Post]]|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="gd">{{cite web|last=Wiseman|first=Eva|date=1 Jun 2014|url=http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/jun/01/mens-rights-internet-forums-distance-from-misogynist-mass-murder|title=The everyday fear of violence every woman has to cope with|work=[[The Guardian]]|accessdate=2 Jun 2014}}</ref> Some of these forums have been described in the media and by the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] (SPLC) as promoting a [[misogynistic]] worldview.<ref name="SPLC">{{cite web|last=[[Southern Poverty Law Center]]|date=Spring 2012|url=http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites|title=Misogyny: The Sites|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="ABC">{{cite web|last=Pry|first=Alyssa|author2=Alexa Valiente|date=16 October 2013|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/women-battle-online-anti-women-hate-manosphere/story?id=20579038|title=Women Battle Online Anti-Women Hate From the 'Manosphere'|work=[[ABC News]]|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref><br />
<br />
==Content==<br />
Caitlin Dewey of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' has described the manosphere as "a vast, diverse network of blogs and forums".<ref name="wp"/> According to ''[[The Guardian]]'' columnist Eva Wiseman, the manosphere is "a mix of men – pick-up artists, male victims of abuse, father's rights proponents – who come together online."<ref name="reddit"/> Notable examples of manosphere sites reportedly include the Red Pill Room, [[A Voice for Men]] and [[Roosh V]]'s website Return Of Kings as well as his personal blog and forum.<ref name="wp"/><ref name="reddit">{{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/jun/01/mens-rights-internet-forums-distance-from-misogynist-mass-murder|title=The everyday fear of violence every woman has to cope with|author=Eva Wiseman|publisher=The Guardian|date=2014-06-01}}</ref><ref name="Greenwood">{{cite web|last=Greenwood|first=Arin|date=12 March 2012|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/10/roosh-v-splc-misogyny-report_n_1335174.html|title=Southern Poverty Law Center Lists 'Roosh V' On Misogyny Report|work=[[The Huffington Post]]|accessdate=3 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="gq">{{cite news|last1=Sharlet|first1=Jeff|authorlink1=Jeff Sharlet (writer)|title=Are You Man Enough for the Men's Rights Movement?|url=http://www.gq.com/story/mens-rights-activism-the-red-pill|accessdate=28 July 2015|work=GQ|date=March 2015}}</ref><br />
<br />
The manosphere has its own distinct [[jargon]]. Manosphere websites commonly use [[red pill and blue pill]] imagery as an analogy; accepting the manosphere's ideology is equated with "taking the red pill", and "blue pill" refers to those who disagree with their philosophy. The terms "[[alpha male]]" and "[[beta male]]" are also commonly used.<ref name="wp"/> <br />
<br />
[[Reddit]] is a popular gathering place for manosphere supporters, and there are several forums on the site that are geared toward its ideas. One of these, the Red Pill subreddit, has over 100,000 subscribers.<ref name="reddit"/><ref>{{cite news|last1=Love|first1=Dylan|title=Inside Red Pill, The Cult For Men Who Don't Understand Women|url=http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-red-pill-reddit-2013-8|accessdate=18 August 2015|work=Business Insider Australia|date=16 September 2013}}</ref><br />
<br />
==Ideology==<br />
According to Caitlin Dewey of ''[[The Washington Post]]'', the manosphere's "core philosophy basically boils down to this: (1) feminism has overrun/corrupted modern culture, in violation of nature/biology/inherent gender differences, and (2) men can best seduce women (slash, save society in general) by embracing a super-dominant, uber-masculine gender role, forcing ladies to fall into step behind them."<ref name="wp"/> Eva Wiseman of ''[[The Guardian]]'' stated that "Advocates of the men's rights movement are united by their belief that feminism is the enemy."<ref name="reddit"/> They are also strongly opposed to [[circumcision]], and believe that a double standard exists in society in how circumcision is viewed relative to [[female genital mutilation]].<ref name="splitsburgh">{{cite web|last=Geddes|first=Adam|date=27 March 2012|url=http://splitsburgh.com/circumcised-or-intact-screw-her-preference/|title="Circumcised or Intact?!" Screw Her Preference!|work=[[Splitsburgh]]|accessdate=10 May 2015}}</ref> ''[[GQ (magazine)|GQ]]'''s Jeff Sharlet described A Voice For Men as "surprisingly pro-gay, or at least ''anti''-anti-gay".<ref name="gq"/><br />
<br />
==Commentary and criticism==<br />
<br />
[[Rod Dreher]] of ''[[The American Conservative]]'' has said that the manosphere "dehumanizes both men and women".<ref name="dreher">{{cite web|last=Dreher|first=Rod|authorlink=Rod Dreher|date=29 May 2014|url=http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/women-who-love-men-who-hate-women/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=women-who-love-men-who-hate-women|title=Women Who Love Men Who Hate Women|work=[[The American Conservative]]|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref> Caitlin Dewey accuses it of excluding gay, lesbian, and transgender people.<ref name="wp"/><br />
<br />
Mark Potok, a spokesman of the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] (SPLC), claimed that the forums are filled with "pure unvarnished women hatred" and compares the manosphere to [[white supremacist]] websites.<ref name="csm">{{cite web|last=Paulson|first=Amanda|date=28 May 2014|url=http://news.yahoo.com/santa-barbara-killings-did-misogynist-hate-groups-play-233026107.html|title=Santa Barbara killings: Did misogynist hate groups play a role?|work=[[Christian Science Monitor]]/[[Yahoo! News]]|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref> The SPLC later added a caveat, saying, "It should be mentioned that the SPLC did not label MRAs as members of a hate movement; nor did our article claim that the grievances they air on their websites – false rape accusations, ruinous divorce settlements and the like – are all without merit. But we did call out specific examples of misogyny and the threat, overt or implicit, of violence."<ref name="SPLC2">{{cite web|last=Goldwag|first=Arthur|date=15 May 2012|url=http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/05/15/intelligence-report-article-provokes-outrage-among-mens-rights-activists/|title=Intelligence Report Article Provokes Fury Among Men’s Rights Activists|work=[[Southern Poverty Law Center]]|accessdate=3 June 2014}}</ref><br />
<br />
Michael Brendan Dougherty of ''[[Business Insider]]'' criticized the SPLC for including manosphere sites on its list of "hate-groups" and for providing pejorative personal details on the sites' authors.<ref name="Dougherty">{{cite web|last=Dougherty|first=Michael Brendan|date=9 March 2012|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/civil-rights-group-is-now-criticizing-random-jerks-for-not-calling-women-back-after-sex-2012-3|title=A Civil Rights Group Is Now Criticizing Random Jerks For Not Calling Women Back After Sex|work=[[Business Insider]]|accessdate= 3 June 2014}}</ref> Mike Riggs of [[Libertarianism in the United States|Libertarian]] magazine ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]'' also criticized the SPLC for defining manosphere sites as "hate-groups." Said Riggs, "Take note, America: Having consensual sex (Roosh is not a rapist, but a seducer) with someone you don't actually like and then never calling her/him again will land you in a reputation-ruining SPLC report."<ref name="Riggs">{{cite web|last=Riggs|first=Mike|date=9 March 2012|url=http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/09/the-southern-poverty-law-center-is-now-w|title=The Southern Poverty Law Center Is Now Writing About Pickup Artists as Hate Groups|work=[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]|accessdate=3 June 2014}}</ref><br />
<br />
Eva Wiseman has written that commenters on manosphere blogs often make statements to the effect that "women are designed solely for sex and sandwich-making" and has suggested that the tone of these websites creates a culture that contributes to violence against women.<ref name="reddit"/><br />
<br />
Following the [[2014 Isla Vista killings]], many mainstream news sources reported links between the killer [[Elliot Rodger]] and posts to a manosphere forum about the [[Seduction community|pick-up artist community]].<ref>{{<br />
Citation|title=The Pick-Up Artist Community's Predictable, Horrible Response to a Mass Murder|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/05/24/elliot_rodger_the_pick_up_artist_community_s_predictable_horrible_response.html|author=Amanda Hess|publisher=Slate|date=2014-05-24}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2638950/Women-hating-Pick-Up-Artist-groups-laud-virgin-killer-vile-murderous-comments-online.html|title=Women-hating 'Pick-Up-Artist' groups laud the 'virgin killer' for his vile and murderous comments online|author=James Nye|publisher=Daily Mail|date=2014-05-27}}</ref> Caitlin Dewey, writing for ''The Washington Post'', said that while the manosphere was not to blame for Rodger's attack and it would be irresponsible to make that claim, "Rodger's misogynistic rhetoric seems undeniably influenced by the manosphere".<ref name="wp"/> Many Manosphere commenters also strongly rejected any attempts to blame the manosphere for the killings, with one commenter writing that "His [Rodger] is a perfect case of someone who needed the red pill...Because it's somewhere he could come to vent, and be angry, and not have his pain be dismissed, ridiculed or ignored." <ref name="reddit"/> Professor [[Michael Kimmel]] similarly opined "it would be facile to argue the manosphere ... urged [Rodger] to do this. I think those places are kind of a solace ... They provide a kind of locker room, a place where guys can gripe about all the bad things that are being done to them by women".<ref>{{Citation|author=Nelson, Libby|url=http://www.vox.com/2014/5/29/5754786/the-santa-barbara-shootings-and-angry-white-men|title='It's a way to retrieve your manhood': a cultural explanation of the Santa Barbara shooting|date=2014-05-29|publisher=Vox}}</ref> In the days immediately following the shooting, other manosphere sites, such as A Voice For Men, saw a huge increase in traffic.<ref name="gq"/><br />
<br />
Nicholas James Pell of [[paleoconservative]] site ''[[Taki's Magazine]]'' said that the manosphere "asks difficult questions and poses uncomfortable truths." Pell criticized a report by ''[[ABC News]]'' on the manosphere for not giving the topic "a fair shake" and concluded that "the men's-rights wing of the manosphere is distinguished by a class and refinement totally missing from the shrieking hysteria of modern feminist blogging".<ref name="Pell">{{cite web|last=Pell|first=Nicholas James|date=26 October 2013|url=http://takimag.com/article/we_have_nothing_to_fear_but_the_manosphere_itself_nicholas_james_pell/print#axzz33DEV4pjM|title=We Have Nothing to Fear but the Manosphere Itself|work=[[Taki's Magazine]]|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref><br />
<br />
BBC television personality [[Reggie Yates]] made a documentary on Britons who take part in the manosphere.<ref name="bbc">{{cite episode | title = Men at War | url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06s5h18/reggie-yates-extreme-uk-2-men-at-war | series = Reggie Yates' Extreme UK | network = [[BBC]] | station = [[BBC Three]] | air-date = January 12, 2016 | season = 1 | number = 2 | minutes = 22}}</ref><br />
<br />
== See also ==<br />
* [[Alt-right]]<br />
* [[Complementarianism]]<br />
* [[Identity politics]]<br />
* [[Masculinism]]<br />
* [[Misandry]]<br />
* [[Patriarchy]]<br />
<br />
==References==<br />
{{reflist|2}}<br />
<br />
{{Masculism}}<br />
{{Manosphere}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Blogospheres]]<br />
[[Category:Criticism of feminism]]<br />
[[Category:Masculinity]]<br />
[[Category:Men and feminism]]<br />
[[Category:Men's rights]]</div>Pandroid